| nation | Current status | Is it feasible for a foreign principal to | core risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thailand | strict restrictions | ❌ Not feasible | Commercial surrogacy has been closed to foreigners since 2015, and is limited to close relatives of domestic married couples. |
| Cambodia | total ban | ❌ Not feasible, facing criminal prosecution | Treated as a crime of human trafficking, major law enforcement operations in 2024, many people sentenced |
| Vietnam | limited legality | ❌ No path for foreigners | Only domestic married couples and close relatives are allowed, and there are many restrictions on surrogacy parties. |
| Laos | The name is forbidden and the reality is confusing | ❌ The law expressly prohibits foreigners from | There are loopholes in the enforcement of regulations, but violations can lead to up to life imprisonment |
| Malaysia | prohibit | ❌ Not feasible | Religious, medical, and legal obstacles lead to no legal path |
| Indonesia | not allowed | ❌ Not feasible | No legal support, double religious and cultural barriers |
| the Philippines | legal gray area | ⚠️Legal risks are extremely high | There are no special regulations, but domestic women who go to Cambodia for surrogacy have been criminally prosecuted |
In the early 2010s, Thailand once became one of the most active commercial surrogacy destinations in the world due to its relatively low medical costs and loose regulatory environment. It was dubbed the "Womb of Asia" by Western media. Everything started to change in the summer of 2014.
In July 2014, Australian media reported a surrogacy incident that shocked the world: an Australian couple (David Farnell and Wendy Li) entrusted Thai surrogate mother Pattaramon Chanbua to get pregnant and gave birth to a pair of twins. One of the baby boys (later named Gammy) had Down syndrome and congenital heart disease. According to the surrogate mother's statement, the client took away the healthy baby girl and refused to accept Gammy.
After the incident was exposed, it was widely reported by global media. What’s even more shocking is that David Farnell was found to have served a prison sentence in Australia for sexually assaulting a minor. This incident also exposed the risks of exploitation of surrogate mothers in commercial surrogacy, the abandonment of babies with disabilities, and institutional loopholes in the lack of background checks. The public donated more than $250,000 towards Gammy's medical treatment.
The Gammy incident directly prompted the Thai legislative body to take action, and a surrogacy ban was officially introduced in 2015.
Core laws:"Protection of Children Born by Assisted Reproductive Technology Act, effective July 30, 2015"
There is no legal surrogacy path for foreign clients in Thailand. Even if there are surrogacy agencies that promote "Thailand surrogacy is possible", the actual operations behind it will inevitably bypass the current laws and face the following risks:
Cambodia briefly became an alternative destination for some surrogacy agencies after Thailand closed its doors. But the Cambodian government's response was swifter and tougher.
Core basis:In November 2016, the Ministry of Justice issued an official announcement (Prakas) banning surrogacy altogether, outlawing embryo transfer for surrogacy. The ban does not distinguish between commercial surrogacy and altruistic surrogacy, and there are no exemptions.
Importantly, Cambodian authorities include surrogacy as ahuman traffickingThe legal framework addresses, rather than treating as just a medical violation. This means that the associated penalties are extremely severe.
background:In October 2024, Cambodian police raided a villa in Kandal Province, Phnom Penh, and arrested 20 Filipinos and 4 Vietnamese. Many of the women were pregnant and were suspected of acting as surrogate mothers.
judgment:In December 2024, 13 Filipino women were sentenced to 4 years in prison by a Cambodian court for violating the surrogacy ban, which was later reduced to 2 years. On December 26 of the same year, they received an amnesty order issued by Cambodian King Norodom Sihamoni and were released and returned to the Philippines after the birth of their child.
significance:This is a landmark event in Cambodia’s escalation of law enforcement on surrogacy. The Filipino woman in the case was herself a recruited surrogate, not an organizer, and she still faced a prison sentence, which shows that even "victims" cannot escape judicial prosecution.
Vietnam is the only country in Southeast Asia that has established a systematic legal framework for surrogacy, but its scope of application is extremely limited and completely closed to foreign clients.
Core basis:"Marriage and Family Law" (revised in 2014) and "Regulations of the Ministry of Health on Assisted Reproductive Technology", Decree No. 207/2025/ND-CP will be added from October 1, 2025 to further improve the relevant details.
Types of surrogacy allowed in Vietnam:For "altruistic gestational surrogacy" only, all of the following conditions must be met:
The new regulations (Decree 207/2025) that will take effect in October 2025 expand the scope of application of assisted reproductive technology and allow single women to use ART, but the core conditions of the surrogacy system itself have not changed—foreign clients still have no legal path.
The surrogacy issue in Laos presents a unique complexity: it is clearly prohibited by law, but in reality the underground surrogacy market is still operating and has attracted international attention.
July 2021:The Lao government has officially promulgated regulations banning commercial surrogacy. At the same time, it is stipulated that if married Laotian couples cannot conceive naturally, their married maternal relatives can serve as surrogates (altruistic surrogacy), and the age must be between 18 and 35 years old.
The most critical terms:The law clearly stipulates that Lao womenNot a foreigner(including Chinese citizens) act as surrogates.
Penalty:Violators face fines ($450 to $45,000) and prison terms ranging from 5 years to life in prison.
In April 2025, Lao police raided a public hospital in Luang Namtha Province and arrested 26 people, including 21 Lao citizens, 2 Myanmar nationals and 3 Chinese recruitment middlemen. They were suspected of organizing a surrogacy network to provide services specifically for Chinese commissioned families.
This case confirms that despite the existence of loopholes in legal supervision in Laos, law enforcement actions have targeted foreign-related surrogacy agency networks, with Chinese clients and Chinese intermediaries being clear targets.
In February 2024, a man was arrested by the Thai border police for illegally entering Laos from Thailand with sperm samples. The investigation revealed that behind it was a transnational network that specialized in collecting sperm for Chinese commissioned families in Thailand and finding surrogate mothers in Laos. Thailand simultaneously launched an investigation and several organizers were arrested.
MalaysiaThere is a complete ban on commercial surrogacy and strict enforcement. Malaysia’s medical regulators do not support surrogacy, and its multi-religious country (Muslims make up the majority and various ethnic groups have different religious norms) also has fundamental disagreements on the ethical acceptability of surrogacy. Even within the academic and medical communities, the ethical discussion of surrogacy is far from a consensus.
IndonesiaThere are no specific surrogacy laws, but in the country with the largest Muslim population, administrative regulations and religious rulings (fatwa) effectively prevent the practice from being legalized. The relevant regulations of the Ministry of Health do not provide any administrative framework support for surrogacy.
There is currently no clear specific law on surrogacy in the Philippines. This "legal gap" is sometimes interpreted as "not illegal", but this interpretation is seriously misleading.
The Cambodian case in 2024 has proven that the network that recruits Filipino women to be surrogates abroad is investigated by the Philippine Department of Justice, and the relevant recruitment agencies face legal prosecution. The women who were recruited were themselves subject to criminal sentences in Cambodia.
From 2014 to 2016, major surrogacy destinations in Southeast Asia (Thailand and Cambodia) successively banned surrogacy through legislation within just two years. This is no accident. There are several structural reasons behind this:
The Gammy incident in 2014 was not only a news event, but also exposed the structural issues in surrogacy—the rights of surrogates, the rights of babies with disabilities, and the qualification review of clients—to the global public’s attention. The Thai government withstood pressure from domestic and foreign public opinion and completed the legislation in less than a year.
In the same year, the Australian media exposed another case: an Australian man, Mitsutoki Shigeta, hired multiple Thai surrogate mothers to give birth to 16 babies at one time. The media called it a "surrogacy factory." Thai society's antipathy towards commercial surrogacy is rising rapidly, and legislation prohibiting it has become an inevitable political choice for the government.
After the ban on surrogacy was implemented in Thailand, intermediaries turned to neighboring countries with weaker regulations, such as Cambodia and Laos. The Cambodian government quickly realized that it had become an "alternative to circumvent Thailand's ban" and followed up with legislation in 2016. This domino effect reflects the common dilemma faced by Southeast Asian countries in regulating cross-border surrogacy.
The core contradiction of surrogacy in Southeast Asia is that surrogates often come from poor families and lack full understanding of the contract content, medical risks and legal consequences, and are vulnerable to double exploitation by intermediaries and clients. This issue has been widely documented in academic circles and international human rights organizations, and has become one of the important bases for governments to tighten regulation.
For Chinese families who are exploring overseas surrogacy, the closure of the Southeast Asian route means:
Want to know about the legal surrogacy paths currently available?
We provide compliant surrogacy services based in Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, and the United States, and can give targeted advice based on your specific situation (marital status, nationality, budget).
Free appointment consultation →